Share insights/feedback, ideas and requests related to the FRP Program.

  • 11

    RFA notes format challenging to work with

    Suggested by Stephen Leuthold – Accepted  – 3 Comments

    The RFA notes feedback - It would be great if carriage returns are retained in the notes as they are entered into the RFA... It comes across as a blob of text all in one paragraph and makes it challenging to read and reformat.

  • 7

    Allow partners to edit endorsements

    Suggested by Adriana Blue – Needs Votes  – 2 Comments

    This is regarding the FastTrack Community partners. 
     
    We are currently unable to edit our endorsement profile, which has resulted in us receiving a referral for a workload that we are not specialized in. We are a Converged communications partner, but we received a referral in SPO due to our ACM, Teams Rooms and phone specializations, that includes that SPO, although it is not requirement to drive growth and consumption around it.
     
    We are hoping the option to edit the endorsements will become available for partners like us that does not have the required specialist to deliver the service and who will be negatively affected by declining the referral.
     
    Thanks!
     

  • 6

    Non Benefit RFA | More details on why they do not qualify for FastTrack

    Suggested by Stephen Brown – Accepted  – 1 Comments

    We have started to receive 'Non-Benefit' referrals and noticed the notes lack details on why the customer did not qualify for the FT Benefit. Most of them seem like they should have qualified.
     
    Could more detail be provided on why the customer did not qualify for the FT Benefit? This could help us get to the right solution for the customer faster.

  • 5

    Teams Rooms Sand Box

    Suggested by Khurram Ahmed – Accepted  – 1 Comments

    Hello!

    We recently received an RFA for Teams Rooms configuration which we don't get often and don't have test environment, devices or lab to fully deploy and test the Teams Room configuration.

    For better customer experience and learning purpose, it would be nice if Microsoft can provide us with Sandbox with Teams Rooms licenses along with demo and virtual Polycom and Surface Hub Gen 1 devices so we can test out few scenarios to successfully deliver customer engagements.

    Thank you 

  • 3

    NCE Customer Eligibility

    Suggested by Jami Styx – New  – 0 Comments

    As partners and Microsoft focus on moving customers to NCE contracts at renewal, is Microsoft considering allowing customers renewing from EA into NCE to be eligible for the MW Security Deployment Offer voucher program? We have several opportunities where we are working with Microsoft on renewals and encouraging customers to move to NCE, which disqualifies them from the voucher program. These customers are renewing from M365 E3 to M365 E5 and need assistance with deploying security products and would be a great fit for the deployment voucher.

  • 3

    QTM MW and Security Deployment Vouchers

    Suggested by Karen Naidoo – Needs Votes  – 1 Comments

    Please add an option to add multiple files when submitting our claims. Often you revert to us to ask for the sign log. Will causes a delay in approval. We could submit the sign log together with the signed document. 

  • 2

    QTM MW and Security Deployment Vouchers - Redemption in Partner Center?

    Suggested by Tim Van Liew – New  – 0 Comments

    We are a global company that manages FastTrack centrally. We recently received questions from our teams in Germany and Australia about redeeming Deployment Vouchers. We confirmed we could, but now have to figure out the Accounting on the back end for the payments. It would be better if we could redeem these vouchers through Partner Center where we already have Partner IDs and Payment and Tax profiles set up for these various markets. Is there a reason that Workshops are managed through the MCI portal and Partner Center, but Vouchers have to be managed in the FastTrack Partner Community Portal?

  • 2

    Eligible customers voucher visibility

    Suggested by Amim Khan – Needs Votes  – 2 Comments

    There should be a list of customers which should be made available to account managers or partners so we can proactively work with the ATU team on utilization and also working closely with the sales team for ensuring it is in the system, so the vouchers are eligible post sales, just like we had it in the days of Software Assurance vouchers.

  • 2

    Create FPC Ideas Category for Referrals Decline Reasons

    Suggested by Hiroaki Naruse – Rejected  – 3 Comments

    Could you kindly consider creating " Others" category for Decline Reason of referrals? This will allow us to let Microsoft referral team know correct reason, and the assignment team can properly handle cusotmer's request after the Decline.

  • 1

    CPOR - please renaming Security Usage Incentive in PartnerCenter

    Suggested by Michiel Gedopt – Rejected  – 0 Comments

    We need to log CPOR for program performance. We have clients that decline to complete the POE for CPOR because we are claiming Copilot or other Modern Workloads all because in partnercenter currently CPOR of Modern work or Security workloads is called Security Usage Incentive this is confusing for the client! please rename the partnercenter ability to CPOR to something more generic like CPOR for Modern Work/Security or something but not only "Security Usage Incentive"     many thanks
Suggest a new idea
    Please sign in to provide feedback in this idea forum.

    Search Ideas