Suggested by LeeAnne Hughes – Rejected
The new process is pretty simple and I am happy w/ the changes that were made. It is a huge improvement over the previous process. Kudos on that.
My only feedback is that if the partner already has some workloads claimed for a customer and they are claiming additional workloads, the workloads claimed previously shows as claimed by another partner, when the other partner is themselves. In my opinion, if the partner already has claimed workloads, it should just show the CLAIM ID by those services. If a DIFFERENT PARTNER has claims for those workloads, then the previous statement would be accurate.
Status details
As we work to improve how we capture and act upon your feedback, we will redirect future submissions on the OSU/CPOR Program outside of the Forum. The OSU/CPOR Program category will be retired starting February 1st.
All new ideas or feedback on the program or process should be sent directly to your FastTrack Partner Manager (FPM) or Partner Development Manager (PDM). They will raise this feedback directly with the CPOR/OSU team for triage and update you on the status.
We have noticed that many feedback items are really support concerns. For fastest response, these should instead be submitted via OSU/CPOR support channels. Learn more about the process in these Knowledge Articles:
For initial support with OSU:
For escalations with the FastTrack Partner Support Team: