Other ideas/suggestions

 Partner shared pain point when training internal teams on various propensity tools: SPARK, CloudAscent,  LightHouse, & MPX on wording/descriptions, noticing that our GTM resources & Learn article descriptions of the tools can be misleading in wording insinuating net "new" customer propensity versus "existing" partner- customer propensity.  While our data propensity models are referring to opportunities exposed within a partners existing associated customer base, our GTM PB/learn doc refer to terminology such as customer "acquisition", and "prospect"  which can imply there being net new logo propensity data. This can cause confusion for customers when training internal teams, sellers, alliance managers, or when presenting to leadership internally and can require mismanagement of expectations.  Attachments  Referring to:CloudAscent Partner Center Learn Portal - Partner Center | Microsoft LearnSPARK Propensity in Partner Center Insights - Partner Center | Microsoft LearnFY26-Security-Commercial-Partner-Playbook (5).pdf

Suggestion for next event - Explore presenting slides via PowerPoint Live in the meeting so that the links in the slides are clickable for the audience. Something I learned when conducting webinars

We find ourselves more often than not educating the Microsoft Field sellers on the MWDO (voucher) program - They have historically not all been aware and they don't attach it to the MSX opportunity, resulting in an RFA, with no funding post-sale.

Have you begun measuring how many dynamic/prioritized customers have an FRP attached vs. how many do not? Might that become a measured outcome of success in the future?