Other ideas/suggestions

Easier visibility of licensing and renewal information in MPX. Beyondsoft’s revenue is ~98–99% services with very little CSP, so they lack license/renewal signals and must rely on customer relationship for intel. I walked them through where to click into tenant licenses and dates, but BYS flagged this as a structural visibility gap.

The FastTrack Service description should be clear of partner obligations surrounding FY26 partner obligations on ADG's and delivery of the benefit. This can be confusing to customers and injects potential conflict when working with customers who's misalignment in the benefit description and partner obligation. Partner also needs to understand obligation to resource their team to align with new obligations. 

 Partner shared pain point when training internal teams on various propensity tools: SPARK, CloudAscent,  LightHouse, & MPX on wording/descriptions, noticing that our GTM resources & Learn article descriptions of the tools can be misleading in wording insinuating net "new" customer propensity versus "existing" partner- customer propensity.  While our data propensity models are referring to opportunities exposed within a partners existing associated customer base, our GTM PB/learn doc refer to terminology such as customer "acquisition", and "prospect"  which can imply there being net new logo propensity data. This can cause confusion for customers when training internal teams, sellers, alliance managers, or when presenting to leadership internally and can require mismanagement of expectations.  Attachments  Referring to:CloudAscent Partner Center Learn Portal - Partner Center | Microsoft LearnSPARK Propensity in Partner Center Insights - Partner Center | Microsoft LearnFY26-Security-Commercial-Partner-Playbook (5).pdf